Criminal

Family

Wills, Probate & Trusts

Employment

Conveyancing & Property

Immigration

Personal Injury

Consumer

Company & Commercial

Libel & Defamation

Assaulting a Police Officer in the Execution of their Duty

How a Criminal Record Can Impact on Your Future

What is Sharia Law?

The Use of DNA in Criminal Cases

Breach of the Peace Explained

Penalties for Driving Without a License

The Law on Using a Mobile Phone Whilst Driving

UK Laws on Car Theft and Joyriding

Hate Crimes and Hate Incidents Explained

What is the Age of Criminal Responsibility?

Failing to Provide Driver Information

How can I help a neighbour that I think is being abused?

What is contempt of court? LocalSolicitors.com

What is contempt of court?

Unfortunately criminal cases are often one person's word against another although there is usually something to corroborate the case - here it could be a record of the phone call being made or evidence of an existing grudge or other behaviour previously directed at the complainant.

If your friend denies the call was ever made then the complainant's record of incoming calls will be important, particularly if the complainant claims to identify your friend's phone number or voice?

So, perhaps it isn't the strongest case, but the prosecution could still proceed. I'm sure that his legal team are on it.

Can an alleged threat to kill over the phone stand up in a court of law?

For the prosecution to prove a case of theft, it is necessary that they prove that the person concerned a) Dishonestly b) appropriated, property that c) belonged to another and d) that they did so with the intention of permanently depriving the owner of that property. In this case you feel that the fact that you hadn't left the shop means that they can't prove b), that there was an appropriation. Goods are 'appropriated' as soon as the person assumes the rights of an owner. The case law regarding shoplifting offences says that that occurs when the goods are removed from the shelves. However, the Crown then need to prove that the person was acting dishonestly. This is where your defence lies. The fact that the goods were not removed from the shop will of course make it harder for the Crown to prove that you were acting dishonestly. This is the type of case where the prosecution are likely to rely on bad character evidence if there have been any similar previous convictions. If, as you say, your actions were not dishonest and that there was an intention to pay for the goods, it is for the Crown to prove otherwise 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. In this case, as you have described events, they will struggle to prove their case against your friend. My assumption is that they are treating this as a joint enterprise and this makes the Crown's job even harder in relation to you. Definitely obtain legal advice and obtain representation before you attend court.

Charged with 2 thefts from 2 shops, when I was detained in the second shop and did not attempt to leave without paying?

What is contempt of court?

undefined Solicitor Answers

Related Questions